One clear table for AI inference speed, VRAM and training throughput across current GPUs — from workstation cards to data-center Blackwell hardware. Reference numbers to help you pick the right GPU for your workload.
Highest AI Inference Index in the field. Every number below is scaled against the RTX 3090 at 100.
Filter by VRAM, sort any column, and tap the + on any two rows to send them straight into the head-to-head arena below.
| Pick | GPU ↕ | VRAM ↕ | AI Index ▼ | FP16 TFLOPS ↕ | Training ↕ | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96 GB |
403
|
— | — | Largest LLMs without quantization, multi-tenant serving | ||
|
RTX Pro 5000 Blackwell
Flagship
|
48 GB |
285
|
— | — | High-throughput production inference | |
| 48 GB |
238
|
— | — | Best price-to-performance for serious inference | ||
| 32 GB |
207
|
419.1 | — | Fastest single-GPU inference & image generation | ||
| 40 GB |
152
|
312.0 | 1,396 img/s | Proven data-center training workhorse | ||
| 32 GB |
146
|
— | — | Balanced training + inference workstation | ||
|
RTX 4080 Super Pro
Mid
|
32 GB |
139
|
— | — | Mid-range inference & light fine-tuning | |
| 24 GB |
133
|
165.2 | 1,301 img/s | Best all-round price-to-performance card | ||
| 24 GB |
100
|
35.6 | 905 img/s | Budget-friendly entry into serious AI work | ||
|
V100 32GB
Entry
|
32 GB |
84
|
125.0 | — | Legacy data-center training | |
| 24 GB |
83
|
— | — | Compact workstation inference | ||
|
V100 16GB
Entry
|
16 GB |
62
|
125.0 | 833 img/s | Light training / dev environments | |
|
RTX 4070 Ti Super
Mid
|
16 GB |
56
|
— | — | Hobbyist projects & prototyping | |
|
RTX A4000
Entry
|
16 GB |
51
|
19.2 | — | Entry-level dev work, small models | |
| 96 GB | — | — | — | Power-efficient Max-Q variant for dense workstation builds | ||
| 96 GB | — | — | — | Boxed workstation edition, same silicon as Server Edition | ||
|
B200 SXM
Flagship
|
180 GB | — | 2,250.0 | — | Largest-scale multi-GPU training clusters | |
| 192 GB | — | 1,750.0 | — | Massive-context LLM training & serving | ||
|
Instinct MI350X
Flagship
|
288 GB | — | 2,306.9 | — | Massive VRAM pool for huge models, AMD ROCm stacks | |
|
Instinct MI325X
Flagship
|
256 GB | — | 1,307.4 | — | Large-model inference with huge memory headroom | |
| 141 GB | — | 989.5 | — | High-bandwidth-memory LLM serving at scale | ||
| 141 GB | — | 989.5 | — | PCIe/NVLink-bridge alternative to SXM for air-cooled racks | ||
|
Gaudi 3
Flagship
|
128 GB | — | 1,835.0 | — | Intel-based large-scale training alternative | |
|
Instinct MI300X
Flagship
|
192 GB | — | 1,307.4 | — | Single-GPU serving of very large open-weight models | |
| 80 GB | — | 989.5 | — | Industry-standard large-model training & inference | ||
|
RTX 6000 Ada
Flagship
|
48 GB | — | — | — | Top-tier workstation for training & rendering | |
| 32 GB | — | 419.1 | — | Blower-style RTX 5090 for dense multi-GPU builds | ||
| 24 GB | — | — | — | China-compliant RTX 5090 variant, cost-efficient rigs | ||
| 94 GB | — | 835.5 | — | Dual-GPU NVLink inference for very large models | ||
|
H100 PCIe
High-end
|
80 GB | — | 756.5 | — | PCIe-server LLM training & inference | |
| 80 GB | — | 756.5 | — | China-compliant H100 equivalent, reduced NVLink bandwidth | ||
| 80 GB | — | 312.0 | — | Export-compliant A100 alternative for restricted regions | ||
| 80 GB | — | 312.0 | — | Proven large-batch training workhorse | ||
| 40 GB | — | 312.0 | — | China-compliant A100 equivalent for large-scale training | ||
| 48 GB | — | 733.0 | — | Mixed training + inference + rendering server card | ||
| 32 GB | — | — | — | High-end workstation training & inference | ||
|
Instinct MI250X
High-end
|
128 GB | — | 383.0 | — | Large-memory AMD training clusters | |
|
RTX 4070 Ti
Mid
|
12 GB | — | 40.1 | — | Strong price-to-performance for local inference | |
|
L4
Mid
|
24 GB | — | 242.0 | — | Low-power inference & video AI at scale | |
| 48 GB | — | 181.1 | — | Graphics + AI mixed workloads on one card | ||
| 64 GB | — | 181.0 | — | PCIe AMD training/inference card | ||
|
Instinct MI100
Mid
|
32 GB | — | 184.6 | — | Earlier-gen AMD CDNA training/inference card | |
| 48 GB | — | 119.5 | — | Efficient server inference with large VRAM | ||
|
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Mid
|
24 GB | — | 122.8 | — | AMD consumer flagship for local inference | |
|
RTX 4080 Super
Mid
|
16 GB | — | 104.4 | — | Strong mid-range inference & gaming/AI hybrid use | |
|
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Mid
|
20 GB | — | 103.2 | — | AMD mid-high consumer inference card | |
|
RTX 4080
Mid
|
16 GB | — | 97.5 | — | Solid mid-range inference workstation card | |
| 48 GB | — | 32.6 | — | Large-VRAM legacy workstation for bigger models | ||
|
A40
Mid
|
48 GB | — | 149.7 | — | Large-VRAM data-center inference card | |
| 24 GB | — | 165.0 | — | Efficient shared-server inference | ||
| 24 GB | — | 125.0 | — | Cost-efficient cloud inference card | ||
| 24 GB | — | 39.6 | — | Workstation training with large VRAM headroom | ||
|
RTX A6000
Mid
|
48 GB | — | 38.7 | — | Large-VRAM workstation for bigger models | |
|
RTX 3090 Ti
Mid
|
24 GB | — | 40.0 | — | High-VRAM consumer card for local models | |
|
RTX 3080 Ti
Mid
|
12 GB | — | 34.1 | — | Strong mid-range gaming/AI hybrid card | |
|
Arc A770
Mid
|
16 GB | — | 39.4 | — | Budget Intel card for OpenVINO/local inference | |
|
T4
Entry
|
16 GB | — | 65.0 | — | Very low-power cloud inference card | |
|
RTX A5000
Entry
|
24 GB | — | 27.8 | — | Reliable mid-VRAM workstation card | |
| 20 GB | — | 23.6 | — | Small-batch workstation training | ||
| 20 GB | — | 26.7 | — | Compact single-slot workstation inference | ||
| 20 GB | — | 38.4 | — | Small-form-factor workstation inference | ||
|
RTX 3080
Entry
|
10 GB | — | 29.8 | — | Affordable gaming/AI hybrid card | |
| 16 GB | — | 24.0 | — | Low-power small-form-factor inference | ||
| 16 GB | — | 22.3 | — | Legacy Turing workstation card, small models | ||
| 16 GB | — | 138.0 | — | Media/video-AI inference card | ||
|
RTX 3070
Entry
|
8 GB | — | 20.3 | — | Cheapest realistic entry point for small models | |
|
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Entry
|
16 GB | — | 22.1 | — | Budget 16GB card for local LLM experiments | |
| 12 GB | — | 8.0 | — | Ultra-low-power dev / edge inference | ||
|
RTX 4070
Entry
|
12 GB | — | 29.1 | — | Affordable current-gen dev/inference card | |
|
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Entry
|
16 GB | — | 74.4 | — | AMD mid-tier card with generous VRAM | |
| 16 GB | — | 18.7 | — | Legacy Pascal data-center training card | ||
|
RTX 4060
Entry
|
8 GB | — | 15.1 | — | Cheapest current-gen entry inference card | |
|
Instinct MI50
Entry
|
32 GB | — | 26.8 | — | Cheap secondhand AMD VRAM for local inference | |
|
Radeon RX 7600
Entry
|
8 GB | — | 43.5 | — | Budget AMD card for light local inference | |
| 8 GB | — | — | — | Ultra-low-power display/dev card, not AI-focused | ||
| 5 GB | — | — | — | Legacy budget workstation card, minimal AI use | ||
| 4 GB | — | 2.2 | — | Display-output card, not suitable for real AI workloads | ||
| 4 GB | — | — | — | Ultra-budget entry GPU, not recommended for AI workloads |
Showing 78 of 78 cards
A multi-GPU server isn't judged like a single card — what matters is its combined compute across every GPU inside it. Total Compute below takes the matched per-card FP16 TFLOPS figure from the table above and multiplies it by GPU count, so servers stay on the same benchmark scale. 48 systems currently in our AI Hardware catalog — tap any name for full specs and pricing.
| Server | GPU Configuration | Total VRAM | Total Compute (FP16 TFLOPS) | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVIDIA DGX B200
DGX / Desktop
|
8x Blackwell GPUs, 1,440GB | 1,440 GB | 18,000.0 | $515,000 |
|
Gigabyte G893-SD1-AAX5
Rack Server
|
8x B200 SXM (HGX B200) | 1,440 GB | 18,000.0 | Request Quote |
|
Gigabyte G893-ZD1-AAX5
Rack Server
|
8x B200 SXM (HGX B200) | 1,440 GB | 18,000.0 | Request Quote |
|
HGX B200 8-GPU Baseboard
Baseboard
|
8x B200, 1,536GB HBM3e | 1,536 GB | 18,000.0 | Request Quote |
|
NVIDIA DGX H100
DGX / Desktop
|
8x H100 SXM5, 640GB | 640 GB | 7,916.0 | $6,700 |
|
NVIDIA DGX H200
DGX / Desktop
|
8x H200 SXM5, 1,128GB | 1,128 GB | 7,916.0 | Request Quote |
|
ASRock Rack 6U8X-EGS2
Rack Server
|
8x H200 SXM | 1,128 GB | 7,916.0 | $2,500 |
|
ASUS ESC N8-E11
Rack Server
|
8x H200 SXM (HGX) | 1,128 GB | 7,916.0 | $2,600 |
|
Dell PowerEdge XE9680
Rack Server
|
8x H100 SXM | 640 GB | 7,916.0 | $22,000 |
|
Gigabyte G593-SD2-AAX1
Rack Server
|
8x H100 SXM, 640GB | 640 GB | 7,916.0 | $5,600 |
|
Gigabyte G593-ZD2 (H100 Barebone)
Rack Server
|
8x H100 SXM5 (barebone) | 640 GB | 7,916.0 | $45,000 |
|
Gigabyte G593-ZD2 (H200 Barebone)
Rack Server
|
8x H200 SXM5 (barebone) | 1,128 GB | 7,916.0 | Request Quote |
|
Lenovo ThinkSystem SR675 V3
Rack Server
|
8x H100 SXM | 640 GB | 7,916.0 | $300,000 |
|
Lenovo HGX H200 8-GPU Server
Rack Server
|
8x H200 SXM, 141GB each | 1,128 GB | 7,916.0 | Request Quote |
|
Quanta S7PH H100
Rack Server
|
8x H100 SXM | 640 GB | 7,916.0 | $280,000 |
|
Quanta S7PH H200 (Barebone)
Rack Server
|
8x H200 SXM (barebone) | 1,128 GB | 7,916.0 | $20,000 |
|
HGX H100 Baseboard (Liquid)
Baseboard
|
8x H100 SXM5, 640GB, liquid-cooled | 640 GB | 7,916.0 | $3,400 |
|
HGX H100 8-GPU Baseboard
Baseboard
|
8x H100 SXM5, 640GB | 640 GB | 7,916.0 | $3,400 |
|
HGX H200 8-GPU Baseboard (Air)
Baseboard
|
8x H200 SXM, 1,128GB, air-cooled | 1,128 GB | 7,916.0 | Request Quote |
|
HGX H200 8-GPU Baseboard (Liquid)
Baseboard
|
8x H200 SXM, 1,128GB, liquid-cooled | 1,128 GB | 7,916.0 | Request Quote |
|
NVIDIA DGX H800
DGX / Desktop
|
8x H800 SXM5, 640GB | 640 GB | 6,052.0 | Request Quote |
|
Supermicro HGX H800 SYS-821GE
Rack Server
|
8x H800 SXM | 640 GB | 6,052.0 | $5,499 |
|
HGX H200 4-GPU Baseboard
Baseboard
|
4x H200 SXM, 564GB | 564 GB | 3,958.0 | $180,000 |
|
Lenovo HGX H200 4-GPU Board
Baseboard
|
4x H200 SXM, liquid-cooled | 564 GB | 3,958.0 | $7,800 |
|
Supermicro SYS-741GE-TNRT
Compact
|
4x H100 PCIe | 320 GB | 3,026.0 | $5,999 |
|
NVIDIA DGX A100
DGX / Desktop
|
8x A100 SXM4, 640GB | 640 GB | 2,496.0 | Request Quote |
|
Exeton Quasar 640X
Rack Server
|
8x A100 SXM, 640GB NVLink | 640 GB | 2,496.0 | Request Quote |
|
Gigabyte G492-ZD0 (Used)
Rack Server
|
8x A100 SXM | 640 GB | 2,496.0 | Request Quote |
|
Supermicro AS-4124GO-NART+
Rack Server
|
8x A100 HGX | 640 GB | 2,496.0 | $13,000 |
|
HGX A100 8-GPU Baseboard (640GB)
Baseboard
|
8x A100 SXM4, 640GB | 640 GB | 2,496.0 | $5,600 |
|
HGX A100 8-GPU Baseboard (320GB)
Baseboard
|
8x A100 SXM4 40GB, 320GB total | 320 GB | 2,496.0 | Request Quote |
|
NVIDIA DGX Station A100
DGX / Desktop
|
4x A100, 160GB | 160 GB | 1,248.0 | $85,000 |
|
RTX 5090 Full System
Compact
|
Pre-built RTX 5090 AI workstation | 32 GB | 419.1 | $6,000 |
|
ASUS Ascent GX10
DGX / Desktop
|
GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip | 128 GB | — | Request Quote |
|
ASUS ESC8000A-E12P
Rack Server
|
Dual EPYC 9004, up to 8x GPU | — | — | Request Quote |
|
ASUS XA NB3I-E12
Rack Server
|
8x B300 NVL (HGX B300 NVL8) | — | — | $7,999 |
|
Gigabyte H263-S67 (2U 4-Node)
Compact
|
2U 4-node high-density chassis | — | — | $18,000 |
|
NVIDIA DGX Spark
DGX / Desktop
|
GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip | 128 GB | — | Request Quote |
| Edge AI module, 64GB | 64 GB | — | Request Quote | |
|
QuantaGrid D74H-7U
Rack Server
|
8-GPU chassis (barebone) | — | — | Request Quote |
|
Supermicro AS-8125GS-TNHR (Refurb)
Rack Server
|
8-GPU server (refurbished) | — | — | Request Quote |
|
Supermicro AS-8126GS-NB3RT
Rack Server
|
8x B300 NVL (HGX B300 NVL8) | — | — | $450,000 |
|
Supermicro GH200 SuperServer
DGX / Desktop
|
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper Superchip (used) | — | — | Request Quote |
|
Supermicro SYS-111C-NR-G1
Compact
|
1U GPU-ready server | — | — | $5,600 |
|
Supermicro SYS-212H-TN-G1
Compact
|
2U GPU-ready server | — | — | Request Quote |
|
Supermicro SYS-511E-WR-G1
Compact
|
1U GPU-ready server | — | — | $3,500 |
|
Supermicro SYS-521C-NR-G1
Compact
|
2U GPU-ready server | — | — | $4,500 |
|
Supermicro SYS-522GA-NRT
Compact
|
RTX PRO 6000 / L40S multi-GPU | — | — | Request Quote |
Already spotted a couple of favorites above? Pick any two GPUs and watch them face off on VRAM, inference index, FP16 compute and training throughput — with a plain-language verdict on which one wins, and why.
We start from publicly published GPU-cloud benchmark data — verifiable numbers anyone can check, no in-house guesswork.

Every card is measured across LLM inference, image generation and vision — the work AI hardware actually does all day.
Token-generation speed across popular open-weight models, from lightweight 8B assistants to 70B+ heavyweights.
Diffusion-model throughput and latency, covering everything from fast turbo pipelines to production-quality renders.
Multimodal image understanding and document OCR throughput under realistic concurrent load.

All scores land on one 100-point scale with the RTX 3090 as the baseline — so any two cards compare at a glance.
An independently published single-GPU figure (images/sec), shown where a matching benchmark exists for that exact card.

Reference data for orientation only — real-world results vary with software stack, drivers, batch size and workload. Not a guarantee of performance.
New to these terms? Read the plain-language guide to choosing an AI GPU
Whether you need a specific GPU, a full server build, or simply have a question about the numbers on this page — send it over and a real engineer replies, usually within two hours.
A rough guide to matching GPU tier to what you actually plan to run.
The absolute top tier — built for companies serving AI to thousands of users at once.
Serious production power for demanding teams and heavy daily workloads.
The sweet spot — strong performance at a price a small team can justify.
An affordable way in — learn, prototype and run smaller models locally.
It is a single relative number showing how a GPU performs across LLM inference, image generation and vision workloads combined, scaled so the RTX 3090 always equals 100. A score of 200 means roughly twice the aggregate throughput of an RTX 3090.
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell currently leads our ranking with an AI Inference Index of 403 — roughly four times the aggregate inference throughput of the RTX 3090 baseline — paired with 96 GB of VRAM for the largest LLMs without quantization.
The RTX 5090 (AI Inference Index 207, 32 GB) and RTX 4090 (index 133, 24 GB) offer the strongest price-to-performance for single-GPU inference and image generation. The RTX 4090 Pro variant adds 48 GB of VRAM for larger models while keeping consumer-class value.
For the largest LLMs served without quantization, flagship data-center cards like the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell (96 GB), H200 (141 GB) and Instinct MI300X (192 GB) give you the memory headroom to keep whole models resident. For 8B to 30B models, a single RTX 5090 or RTX 4090 delivers excellent throughput at a fraction of the cost.
Yes — current-generation NVIDIA GPUs and full AI servers are available through our AI Hardware catalog, with worldwide DDP shipping and B2B pricing on request.
It is one of the most widely deployed AI-capable GPUs, making it a practical, well-understood reference point for comparing newer and older hardware.
No. VRAM determines which model sizes and batch sizes fit at all — it does not by itself determine speed. A card with less VRAM can still post a higher inference index if its architecture and memory bandwidth are stronger.
The AMD Instinct MI350X leads at 288 GB, followed by the MI325X at 256 GB. Among NVIDIA cards the B100 SXM offers 192 GB and the H200 provides 141 GB of high-bandwidth memory. More VRAM lets you load bigger models and larger batches without splitting them across multiple GPUs.
FP16 TFLOPS is a theoretical peak compute figure published by the manufacturer — a raw hardware ceiling. The AI Inference Index is a measured, workload-based score built from published benchmarks across LLM, image and vision tasks. A card can show high theoretical TFLOPS yet a lower real-world index when memory bandwidth or software support holds it back.
Both are Hopper-architecture data-center GPUs rated at 989.5 FP16 TFLOPS. The difference is memory: the H200 carries 141 GB of faster HBM3e versus 80 GB on the H100, so it serves larger models and longer context windows at higher sustained throughput. For most new LLM-serving deployments the H200 is the stronger choice.
Yes. Use the comparison Arena on this page to pick any two of our 78 listed GPUs and see their AI Inference Index, VRAM, FP16 TFLOPS and training throughput side by side, with the winner of each metric highlighted.
Training is far more memory- and compute-intensive than inference, so it favors flagship cards with large VRAM and high FP16 TFLOPS such as the H100, H200, B200 or Instinct MI300X class. Our Training Throughput column shows single-GPU images per second where a published benchmark exists — for example 1,396 img/s on the A100 40GB versus 905 on the RTX 3090.
Yes. Alongside 78 individual GPUs we list 48 complete multi-GPU AI servers, including HGX and DGX-class systems built around H100, H200 and Blackwell accelerators, ready for large-scale training and production inference. Contact us for configuration and B2B pricing.
All three are covered. Alongside the full NVIDIA line-up we include AMD Instinct accelerators (MI350X, MI325X, MI300X, MI250X) and Radeon cards, plus Intel Gaudi 3 and Arc, so you can compare across vendors on one consistent index.
Every figure is drawn from publicly published benchmark and manufacturer data, aggregated into a consistent index for orientation. Real-world results vary with software stack, drivers, batch size and workload, so treat the numbers as a comparative guide rather than a guarantee of performance.
We review and refresh figures as new GPU generations launch and as more benchmark data becomes available.
Send your question through the contact form above — or message us on WhatsApp and get an answer in minutes.