Million Miner Logo
Out of Stock
4.7 out of 5 Verified customer reviews Trustpilot

iBeLink

iBeLink BM-S1 6.8 TH/s Blake2B Siacoin Miner

Model: BM-S1

6.8 TH/s 2350W Blake2b-Sia 345.59 J/TH

Temporarily Unavailable

This product is temporarily unavailable.

Notify Me

Be the first to know when this miner becomes available.

Get a Quote

Interested in this miner? Contact us for availability and pricing.

Get a Quote

Genuine

Tested hardware

Worldwide

Global shipping

Support

Mining experts

The iBeLink BM-S1 is the smallest and lowest draw Siacoin miner iBeLink builds, and the one with a trick the others do not have. At full power it produces 6.8 TH/s from 2,350W. Switch it into ECO mode and it settles at 4.3 TH/s from 1,050W, which works out around 244 J/TH against 346 J/TH at full tilt, so it becomes 29 percent more efficient per terahash while drawing less than half the power. That single feature is what makes this machine interesting, because it turns the weakest performer in the range into something that fits a small circuit and competes with hardware a generation newer. It is a genuinely compact unit too, 9 kg in a 128 x 201 x 402 mm case rather than the 14 kg chassis its bigger siblings share. Buy it for constrained power or a first step into Blake2B, not for scale. MillionMiner ships it worldwide DDP with all customs duties and import taxes paid.

Mining Profitability Calculator

W
Period Daily Monthly Yearly
$9.53 $285.90 $3,478.45
-$2.82 -$84.60 -$1,029.30
$6.71 $201.30 $2,449.15

Using 0.050 $/kWh · Network difficulty as of today. Estimates only. Updated daily. Last refresh: Sep 11, 2026 Adjust rate in the bar above

90 Day Performance

Full Specifications

Hashrate
6.8 TH/s
Power Consumption
2350 W
Efficiency
345.59 J/TH
Algorithm
Blake2b-Sia
Model
BM-S1
Release Year
Mar 2022
Noise Level
75 dB
Dimensions
128 x 201 x 402mm
Weight
9 kg
Voltage
220V
Interfaces
Ethernet
Operating Temp
5 - 40 °C
Humidity
5 - 95 %
Cooling Type
Air

What's in the Box

BM-S1
Power supply unit (PSU)
Power cables
Quick start guide

Contents may vary by batch. Exact items listed in order confirmation.

Quick Setup

1

Connect PSU to miner and plug into the outlet

2

Connect ethernet cable to your router or switch

3

Find miner IP via router admin or IP scanner tool

4

Open web interface, enter pool URL and wallet — start mining

Request a Bitcoin Miner Hosting Quote

Free quote, reply in 24h. No sales call.

4.4
star star star star star

4.7 / 5 on Trustpilot

Verified customer reviews

30,000+ miners delivered

Shipped worldwide since 2020

1,200+ customers globally

Trusted in 50+ countries

iso made-in-germany trustpilot
google-review

Get a Quote for the iBeLink BM-S1 6.8 TH/s Blake2B Siacoin Miner

Pricing, lead time, and hosting options. Personal advice from our sales team.

Reply within 24h via email, WhatsApp, or call.

Product Details

iBeLink BM-S1 Specifications and the ECO Mode Most Listings Leave Out

At full power the iBeLink BM-S1 turns out 6.8 TH/s of Blake2B-Sia hashing from 2,350W, giving 346 J/TH, with roughly 5 percent tolerance on both numbers. The case is 128 x 201 x 402 mm and 9 kg, noticeably smaller and lighter than the 14 kg chassis shared by the BM-S3 and BM-S3+, cooled by fans at 75 dB, wired over Ethernet, rated for 5 to 40 degrees Celsius and 5 to 95 percent humidity. March 2022 makes it the oldest machine iBeLink still lists for Sia. Read only those numbers and the verdict looks harsh, because 346 J/TH is the weakest efficiency in the current Blake2B field. There is a second set of numbers. The BM-S1 carries an ECO mode that drops it to 4.3 TH/s on 1,050W, and the arithmetic there is far kinder: about 244 J/TH, roughly 29 percent better per terahash than the same machine at full tilt, for 37 percent less output and 55 percent less power. Dropped into the category ranking, ECO mode lands ahead of Goldshell's SC5 Pro at 256, ahead of iBeLink's own BM-S1 Max at 263, and within reach of Goldshell's January 2026 SC5 Pro II at 236, which is a very different competitive position from the one the headline spec implies. It also transforms the electrical picture, since 1,050W is around 4.6 amps at 230V against roughly 10.2 amps at full power, so a site that could not accommodate another 2.3 kW machine can very often accommodate this one. Where it sits against its siblings is worth stating plainly. Running flat out, the BM-S1 uses about two and a half times the energy per terahash of the BM-S3+ and produces 27 percent of its hashrate, so as a pure scaling purchase it does not compete. What it offers instead is the smallest electrical and physical commitment in the range, a genuine low power mode that no other model here has, and the lowest cost of entry into Blake2B hashing. Every unit leaves MillionMiner on DDP terms worldwide, with clearance, duty and tax already settled, and stock position confirmed through the quote rather than this page.

Should You Buy the BM-S1? An Honest Answer

On most sites, no, and it is better to say that than to sell someone the wrong machine. Running at full power the BM-S1 needs about two and a half times the electricity per terahash that a BM-S3+ needs. Because it produces 27 percent of that machine's hashrate, it would have to be priced below 27 percent of the BM-S3+ simply to break even on hashrate bought per unit of money, and even at that price the electricity gap keeps working against it every hour it runs. If your intention is to build Siacoin capacity and your power bills are ordinary, the newer models will out-earn this one comfortably enough that the purchase price difference stops mattering within the first year. Three situations change the answer completely. The first is a hard circuit limit. Some sites are not short of total capacity but short of headroom on the individual circuits they already have, and in that position a 1,050W ECO mode machine simply fits where a 3.4 kW one does not. Doing the arithmetic on your actual breaker capacity rather than on your total supply is what settles this, and it is the single most common reason a smaller miner is the correct choice. The second is very cheap or otherwise wasted power. Where electricity costs little or nothing, the efficiency penalty that dominates the calculation elsewhere shrinks to something you can live with, and cost of acquisition becomes the number that matters. The third is a first position in Blake2B. If you want to learn how Sia mining behaves through a difficulty cycle before committing capital at scale, the smallest machine in the range is a rational way to do it, and 9 kg in a compact case is easier to house and move than its siblings. One point deserves emphasis because it is easy to miss: if you are buying this machine for its low draw, run it in ECO mode rather than at full power. At 1,050W and 244 J/TH it is both cheaper to run and better per terahash than at 2,350W, and the hashrate you give up is smaller proportionally than the power you save. Buying a BM-S1 and running it flat out is close to the worst of both worlds.

Need Help Choosing?

Our mining specialists can help you find the perfect miner for your setup and budget.

Siacoin, Blake2B and What You Are Taking On

Sia rents out storage. Spare disk capacity goes on one side of the market, people who need data held pay for it in Siacoin on the other, and the chain enforces the agreements between them. Blake2B is the proof of work that keeps that ledger honest. For a miner the draw is that Sia's fortunes ride on storage demand and the project's own roadmap rather than on the Bitcoin halving clock, so the two can be out of step in either direction, and Blake2B hardware sometimes earns through quarters that are unkind to SHA-256 machines. The counterweight is scale: this is a small capitalisation network, prices travel further in both directions, difficulty reacts quickly when hardware joins or leaves, and turning mined coins into cash is a thinner market than Bitcoin offers. The commitment is narrower than most buyers realise. Blake2B-Sia hardware mines Siacoin and nothing else worth pointing it at, so there is no equivalent of moving a SHA-256 machine between Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash and a handful of smaller chains when the economics move. You are buying a position in one network, and the machine cannot be repurposed if that position sours. Worth knowing too, particularly on a larger order, is that this network has form for changing its protocol in ways that left certain ASICs stranded outside the mainline chain. Search the Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster in any mining database today and it is filed against SiaClassic and SpaceCash rather than Siacoin itself. That is on the record. It does not follow that anything similar is coming, and hardware from established suppliers today occupies different ground than the 2018 machines did, but it does make one question worth putting in writing before a volume purchase: is this model compatible with the network as it currently runs. Two last practicalities. iBeLink builds in smaller runs than Bitmain, so availability tightens quickly whenever Siacoin draws attention, and the independent repair and spare parts market is correspondingly thinner. And the return on any of this depends on the Siacoin price, network difficulty and your tariff, none of which hold still, so plan against a range of outcomes and buy at a size where a poor quarter is inconvenient rather than forced.

ECO Mode: 4.3 TH/s on 1,050W

Roughly 244 J/TH in ECO mode against 346 J/TH at full power, so 29 percent better per terahash on less than half the electricity. If you buy this machine for its low draw, this is how to run it.

Smallest Footprint in the Range

9 kg in a 128 x 201 x 402 mm case, against the 14 kg chassis shared by the BM-S3 and BM-S3+. Easier to house, easier to move, and around 4.6 amps at 230V in ECO mode.

Fits Where Bigger Machines Will Not

The usual reason to choose this model is a circuit with limited headroom rather than a site short of total power. Check breaker capacity, not supply capacity, before deciding.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Two figures rather than one, because this machine has two modes. At full power it delivers 6.8 TH/s of Blake2B-Sia hashing on 2,350W, which is 346 J/TH. In ECO mode it runs 4.3 TH/s on 1,050W, which is roughly 244 J/TH. Both ratings carry about 5 percent tolerance. The second set of numbers is the more interesting one, since ECO mode is 29 percent more efficient per terahash than the same machine at full tilt while drawing less than half the electricity. iBeLink released the BM-S1 in March 2022 and it remains the smallest and lowest draw model in their Siacoin line.

ECO mode is a lower power operating setting that trades hashrate for efficiency: 4.3 TH/s on 1,050W instead of 6.8 TH/s on 2,350W. The trade is favourable, because you give up 37 percent of the output but save 55 percent of the power, which is why efficiency improves from 346 J/TH to around 244. For most buyers the answer is yes, use it. If the reason you chose this machine over a BM-S3 or BM-S3+ was its low electrical draw, running it flat out gives you the worst of both worlds: still not enough hashrate to compete on scale, and worse efficiency than the alternatives. ECO mode also brings the draw to around 4.6 amps at 230V, which is what makes the machine fit circuits that cannot take a larger miner.

It is the smallest and the least efficient at full power. The line runs BM-S1 at 6.8 TH/s and 346 J/TH, BM-S1 Max at 12 TH/s and 263 J/TH, BM-S3 at 19 TH/s and 163 J/TH, and BM-S3+ at 25 TH/s and 136 J/TH. Against the BM-S3+ specifically, the BM-S1 produces 27 percent of the hashrate while using about two and a half times the energy for each terahash it does produce. In ECO mode the comparison improves considerably, with 244 J/TH placing it ahead of the BM-S1 Max, but it is still an entry machine rather than a scaling one. What it uniquely offers within the range is the lowest power draw, the smallest and lightest chassis, and a genuine low power mode that none of the others have.

For most buyers, no, and that is worth saying directly. If you are building Siacoin capacity on ordinary electricity prices, the newer models in the range will out-earn this one by enough that the difference in purchase price stops mattering fairly quickly. It has to cost less than 27 percent of a BM-S3+ merely to match on hashrate purchased per unit of money, and the running cost gap works against it every hour after that. Three situations do justify it: a circuit with limited headroom, where a 1,050W ECO mode machine fits and a 3.4 kW one does not; very cheap or otherwise wasted power, where the efficiency penalty stops dominating; and a first, deliberately small position in Blake2B mining while you learn how the network behaves. Outside those, buy further up the range.

Because J/TH only compares between machines running the same algorithm. A current Bitcoin ASIC quotes around 13 J/TH, but it is doing completely different computational work against a different difficulty scale, so the numbers are not commensurable and setting them side by side tells you nothing. Every Blake2B machine reads badly against Bitcoin hardware. What matters is the ranking inside the algorithm, and there the BM-S1 at full power sits at the bottom of the current field, with the BM-S3+ at 136 J/TH, the BM-S3 at 163, Goldshell's SC6-SE near 194, the SC5 Pro II near 236, the SC5 Pro near 256 and the BM-S1 Max near 263. In ECO mode at roughly 244 J/TH the BM-S1 moves into the middle of that group.

Our listing shows 220V, and at full power the machine draws 2,350W, which is around 10.2 amps at 230V. In ECO mode that falls to 1,050W, roughly 4.6 amps, which is the number that makes this model practical on constrained circuits. It needs its own circuit rather than a shared socket, and no three phase supply or industrial distribution is involved. Voltage information for this model is poorly reported across the market, with some listings showing a bare 12V that appears to describe an internal DC rail rather than the input, so confirm the acceptable input range with us at order rather than relying on a third party listing. As with any multi unit build, size the panel on what the first delivered machines actually draw rather than on the plate rating.

75 dB at full power, which is industrial noise regardless of the machine's modest size, and ECO mode reduces both fan speed and noise. At 2,350W it sheds roughly 8,000 BTU per hour, or about 3,600 in ECO mode. None of that belongs in a living space. A plant room, a ventilated garage or outbuilding, or a hosted rack are the realistic homes. The compact 9 kg case makes it easier to site than its siblings, but the airflow rules are unchanged: cool air must reach the intake freely and hot air must leave without circling back round to the front, because recirculation is what quietly throttles small installations and shortens hardware life.

Siacoin, and effectively nothing else, because Blake2B-Sia is a Sia specific implementation. That is a narrower commitment than a SHA-256 machine, which can be redirected between Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash and various smaller chains as economics shift. Here there is no second option, so the hardware and the network position are the same decision. It is also worth knowing that Sia has previously amended its protocol in ways that left certain ASICs outside the mainline chain, and the Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster is filed by mining databases today against SiaClassic and SpaceCash rather than Siacoin proper as a result. That is record rather than prediction, and current hardware from established suppliers sits differently than the 2018 machines did, but it makes compatibility with the network as it now runs a fair question to ask in writing before a sizeable order.

That turns on the Siacoin price, network difficulty and your electricity rate, and no fixed daily figure survives contact with a small cap network for long. At 2,350W, or 1,050W in ECO mode, your tariff is the input you control, and it matters more here than on the newer models because this machine converts less of each kilowatt into hashrate. Because Blake2B hardware cannot be pointed at another coin, there is no hedge inside the machine either. Model several Siacoin price scenarios rather than one, put your actual rate through the live calculator, and be honest about whether the efficiency gap against a BM-S3 or BM-S3+ is one your electricity price can absorb.

Ordinary air cooled housekeeping: clean fans and heatsinks on a schedule rather than after a fault, check connectors periodically, and expect fans to be the first wear item over a long run. Distributors typically publish a six month iBeLink factory warranty and a PSU included in the box, though both vary by channel and batch, so confirm at order; iBeLink also builds in smaller runs than Bitmain, which means a thinner independent parts and repair market and availability that tightens quickly when Siacoin draws attention. Hosting is worth quoting alongside the hardware, since our managed US sites already run the supply and ventilation this class needs and electricity is the dominant running cost. Treat any published availability date as indicative and confirm current stock and batch timing through the quote.

Get a Quote