iBeLink
Model: BM-S3+
The iBeLink BM-S3+ is the most efficient Siacoin miner on the market. It delivers 25 TH/s on the Blake2B-Sia algorithm at 3,400W, an efficiency of 136 J/TH, which is roughly 42 percent better per terahash than… Goldshell's newest flagship and better than every other Blake2B ASIC in production. It is also the fastest, so unlike most step-ups in this market you are not trading efficiency for output. Deployment is simpler than a modern Bitcoin miner: 190 to 240V single phase on a dedicated circuit, no three phase service and no coolant loop, though at 75 dB and 3.4 kW it belongs in a dedicated room, garage or hosting facility rather than a home. If you are adding Blake2B hashrate and want the most Siacoin per kilowatt available, this is the machine. MillionMiner ships it worldwide DDP with all customs duties and import taxes paid.
Temporarily Unavailable
This product is temporarily unavailable.
Notify Me
Be the first to know when this miner becomes available.
We'll notify you when it's available!
Genuine
Tested hardware
Worldwide
Global shipping
Support
Mining experts
The iBeLink BM-S3+ is the most efficient Siacoin miner on the market. It delivers 25 TH/s on the Blake2B-Sia algorithm at 3,400W, an efficiency of 136 J/TH, which is roughly 42 percent better per terahash than… Goldshell's newest flagship and better than every other Blake2B ASIC in production. It is also the fastest, so unlike most step-ups in this market you are not trading efficiency for output. Deployment is simpler than a modern Bitcoin miner: 190 to 240V single phase on a dedicated circuit, no three phase service and no coolant loop, though at 75 dB and 3.4 kW it belongs in a dedicated room, garage or hosting facility rather than a home. If you are adding Blake2B hashrate and want the most Siacoin per kilowatt available, this is the machine. MillionMiner ships it worldwide DDP with all customs duties and import taxes paid.
| Period | Daily | Monthly | Yearly |
|---|---|---|---|
| $44.64 | $1,339.20 | $16,293.60 | |
| -$4.08 | -$122.40 | -$1,489.20 | |
| $40.56 | $1,216.80 | $14,804.40 |
Using 0.050 $/kWh · Network difficulty as of today. Estimates only. Updated daily. Last refresh: Sep 13, 2026 Adjust rate in the bar above
Contents may vary by batch. Exact items listed in order confirmation.
Connect PSU to miner and plug into the outlet
Connect ethernet cable to your router or switch
Find miner IP via router admin or IP scanner tool
Open web interface, enter pool URL and wallet — start mining
Pricing, lead time, and hosting options. Personal advice from our sales team.
Pricing, lead time, and hosting options. Personal advice from our sales team.
The iBeLink BM-S3+ delivers 25 TH/s on the Blake2B-Sia algorithm at 3,400W, an efficiency of 136 J/TH, or 0.136 J/GH in the notation iBeLink uses. Both figures are rated at about plus or minus 5 percent. It is an air cooled unit measuring 340 x 190 x 293 mm at 14 kg net, 15.5 kg packaged, running at 75 dB, managed over Ethernet, drawing 190 to 240V AC single phase across a 5 to 40 degrees Celsius operating range. iBeLink released it in April 2025 at the top of its Siacoin line. Reading the efficiency figure correctly, because this is where most buyers go wrong. A number like 136 J/TH looks alarming beside a modern Bitcoin miner's 13 J/TH, and the instinct is to conclude the machine is ten… times worse. It is not, and the comparison is meaningless: J/TH only compares between machines running the same algorithm, because Blake2B and SHA-256 are doing entirely different computational work with different difficulty scales. The only useful benchmark is other Blake2B hardware, and measured that way the BM-S3+ leads the entire category. Against every Blake2B-Sia ASIC in production it is the most efficient and the fastest: the iBeLink BM-S3 runs about 163 J/TH, Goldshell's SC6-SE about 194 J/TH, Goldshell's SC5 Pro II, released in January 2026, about 236 J/TH, the Goldshell SC5 Pro about 256 J/TH, the iBeLink BM-S1 Max about 263 J/TH, the Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster about 321 J/TH and the iBeLink BM-S1 about 346 J/TH. In plain terms the BM-S3+ uses roughly 17 percent less energy per terahash than its own predecessor and about 42 percent less than the newest Goldshell flagship, while producing more hashrate than any of them. What that means on a real site. Efficiency is the specification that compounds, because it multiplies across full output running continuously, then across every unit and every year of the deployment, so a category leading J/TH figure is worth more over three years than it appears on a spec sheet. Against the BM-S3 specifically the comparison is unusually clean: 25 TH/s versus 19 TH/s is about 32 percent more hashrate, for 3,400W versus 3,100W, about 10 percent more power. You gain output and improve efficiency at once rather than trading one against the other, which is not how most range step-ups work and which makes the BM-S3+ the right default when you are building around a fixed electrical budget rather than a fixed unit count. Every unit ships from MillionMiner with free DDP worldwide delivery covering customs clearance, duties and taxes, with availability and batch timing confirmed through the quote process.
Sia is a decentralised storage network. Users rent out spare disk capacity, renters pay in Siacoin to store data across it, and the blockchain handles the contracts and payments. Mining secures that network on Blake2B. The appeal for a miner is genuine diversification: Sia's difficulty and price respond to storage demand and its own development cycle rather than to the Bitcoin halving cycle, so Blake2B hardware can perform well in periods when SHA-256 machines are squeezed, and poorly when they are not. It is a small capitalisation network,… which cuts both ways, since moves are larger in both directions and liquidity is thinner than on Bitcoin. Then the part most listings leave out. A Blake2B-Sia machine mines Siacoin and nothing else of consequence. Unlike a SHA-256 miner that can be pointed at Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin SV or a dozen smaller chains when economics shift, this is concentrated exposure to a single network with no fallback. That is not a reason to avoid it, but it is the correct frame for the purchase: you are taking a position on Sia specifically, and the hardware has no second use if that position turns against you. There is also a history here worth understanding before committing at volume. Sia has previously changed its protocol in ways that affected ASIC compatibility, and the machines caught by that change did not simply keep mining: the Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster, once a mainstream Sia miner, is now listed by mining databases as targeting SiaClassic and SpaceCash rather than mainline Siacoin. That is a documented outcome, not a hypothetical, and it is the single most important piece of due diligence for anyone buying Blake2B hardware in quantity. It does not mean the same thing will happen again, and current generation hardware from established suppliers is in a different position to the 2018 dispute, but it does mean that confirming present network compatibility with your supplier before a large order is a reasonable and specific question to ask rather than an abstract caution. Weigh two further practical points. iBeLink is a smaller manufacturer than Bitmain, so production runs are shorter, availability moves quickly when Siacoin interest rises, and spare parts and third party repair options are less widely available than for an Antminer. And returns depend on the Siacoin price, network difficulty and your electricity rate, all three of which move faster on a small cap network than they do on Bitcoin, so model a range of outcomes rather than a single figure and size any purchase so that a difficult stretch does not force you to sell hardware at the wrong moment.
Our mining specialists can help you find the perfect miner for your setup and budget.
The most efficient Blake2B-Sia ASIC in production: 25 TH/s of Siacoin hashrate at 3,400W and 136 J/TH, in an air cooled 340 x 190 x 293 mm chassis weighing 14 kg and running at 75 dB. It takes 190 to 240V single phase on a dedicated circuit, roughly 14 amps at 240V, with no three phase service and no coolant infrastructure required, and it connects over Ethernet. Within the category it leads on both hashrate and efficiency, delivering about 32 percent more output than the iBeLink BM-S3 for roughly 10 percent more power and about 42 percent… better efficiency than Goldshell's newest flagship. Remember that J/TH figures only compare within an algorithm, so 136 J/TH should be read against other Blake2B miners rather than against Bitcoin hardware. The iBeLink BM-S3+ for sale at MillionMiner ships worldwide DDP with duties and taxes paid, so the checkout figure is the final landed cost. For current availability, batch timing and pricing use the quote process, and run your own electricity rate through the calculator before you commit.
25 TH/s at 136 J/TH, ahead of every Blake2B-Sia ASIC on the market: about 17 percent better than the BM-S3 and roughly 42 percent better than Goldshell's newest flagship.
About 32 percent more hashrate than the iBeLink BM-S3 for roughly 10 percent more power. Most step-ups trade one against the other; this one improves both.
190 to 240V on a dedicated circuit, around 14 amps at 240V. No three phase service and no hydro infrastructure, though 75 dB and 3.4 kW of heat mean a dedicated room, garage or hosting facility.
25 TH/s on the Blake2B-Sia algorithm at 3,400W, an efficiency of 136 J/TH, which iBeLink also expresses as 0.136 J/GH. Both figures carry a tolerance of about plus or minus 5 percent, so treat them as ratings rather than guarantees and check what an individual unit reports under sustained load. It is the highest hashrate and the most efficient Blake2B-Sia miner currently in production, and iBeLink released it in April 2025 at the top of its Siacoin line.
Because J/TH figures only compare between machines running the same algorithm. A modern Bitcoin ASIC quotes around 13 J/TH, but it performs entirely different computational work against an entirely different difficulty scale, so setting the two numbers side by side tells you nothing. Judged against the hardware it actually competes with, the BM-S3+ leads the category: the iBeLink BM-S3 is about 163 J/TH, Goldshell's SC6-SE about 194, the Goldshell SC5 Pro II about 236, the SC5 Pro about 256, the iBeLink BM-S1 Max about 263, the Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster about 321 and the iBeLink BM-S1 about 346. Every Blake2B miner looks inefficient next to a Bitcoin miner, which is why the comparison that matters is within the algorithm.
Against the BM-S3 the comparison is unusually clean: 25 TH/s versus 19 TH/s is about 32 percent more hashrate, for 3,400W versus 3,100W, about 10 percent more power. You gain output and improve efficiency simultaneously rather than trading one for the other, so on a fixed electrical budget the BM-S3+ returns meaningfully more Siacoin hashrate per kilowatt. Against Goldshell, which is the main alternative brand in this category, the gap is wider: the SC5 Pro II released in January 2026 runs 14 TH/s at 3,300W for roughly 236 J/TH, so the BM-S3+ produces about 79 percent more hashrate while using roughly 42 percent less energy per terahash. On current published specifications there is no Blake2B-Sia machine that beats it on either measure.
Siacoin (SC) is the target and realistically the only one, because Blake2B-Sia is a Sia specific implementation. That is concentrated exposure: unlike a SHA-256 machine that can move between Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash and other chains when economics shift, this hardware has no fallback coin. It is also worth knowing that Sia has previously changed its protocol in ways that affected ASIC compatibility. The Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster, once a mainstream Sia miner, is now listed by mining databases as targeting SiaClassic and SpaceCash rather than mainline Siacoin. That is history rather than a forecast, and current generation hardware sits in a different position, but confirming present network compatibility with your supplier before a volume order is a specific and reasonable question to ask. Note also that several retail listings for this model are simply wrong, describing it as a Scrypt miner, claiming Decred compatibility or listing its coin as Bitcoin. None of that is accurate.
Sia is a decentralised storage network where users rent out spare disk capacity and renters pay in Siacoin to store data across it, with the blockchain handling contracts and payments. Mining secures the network on Blake2B. The case for mining it is diversification: Sia's difficulty and price respond to storage demand and its own development cycle rather than to the Bitcoin halving cycle, so Blake2B hardware can earn well during periods when SHA-256 machines are under pressure. The counterweight is that Sia is a small capitalisation network, so price and difficulty move faster and further in both directions than on Bitcoin and liquidity is thinner when you come to sell what you mine.
190 to 240V AC single phase, drawing 3,400W continuously, which is roughly 14 amps at 240V and fits a 20 amp circuit with sensible headroom. It needs a dedicated circuit rather than a shared household socket, but it does not need three phase service or industrial distribution, which makes it considerably simpler to deploy than a hydro cooled Bitcoin miner of similar power. That said, 3.4 kW is well beyond what a normal domestic ring circuit should carry alongside other loads, so have the circuit checked before delivery. If you are installing several units, size the panel on measured draw from the first machines rather than on the rated figure alone.
75 dB from its fan cooled design, which is industrial noise on the level of a vacuum cleaner running continuously, and 3,400W of draw becomes roughly 11,600 BTU per hour of heat. That rules out living spaces entirely. A dedicated equipment room, a ventilated garage or outbuilding, or a hosting facility are the realistic options. Give it a clear intake at the front and an unobstructed exhaust path at the back, keep inlet air within the 5 to 40 degrees Celsius operating range, and make sure hot exhaust cannot recirculate into the intake, which is the most common cause of thermal throttling and shortened hardware life in small deployments.
That depends on the Siacoin price, Sia network difficulty and your electricity rate, and on a small cap network the first two move faster than they do on Bitcoin. At 3,400W the power rate is the lever you actually control, and because Blake2B hardware has no alternative coin to switch to, your return is tied entirely to how Sia performs. Published daily figures for this model vary widely between sources and date badly, so they should not be used for planning. Run your own electricity rate through the live calculator, model a range of Siacoin prices rather than a single one, and size any purchase so that a weak stretch does not force you to sell hardware at the wrong moment. What the hardware does give you is the best efficiency in its category, which means it stays viable at electricity rates where other Blake2B machines stop working.
Setup follows the standard ASIC workflow. Confirm a dedicated 190 to 240V circuit with proper grounding, place the unit where 75 dB and 3.4 kW of heat are acceptable, connect the power cable and an Ethernet cable to your router or switch, then power on and find the miner's IP through your router's DHCP table or an IP scanner. Open the web interface, change the default credentials immediately, and enter your Sia pool address, worker name and Siacoin wallet address. Sia is mined on pools that support Blake2B, and because the pool landscape for a smaller network changes more often than Bitcoin's, check which pools are currently active and well populated before committing rather than working from an old list.
Maintenance is standard air cooled ASIC upkeep: clear dust from fans and heatsinks regularly, inspect hashboard connectors periodically, keep the unit inside its rated temperature range and treat fans as a wear item over a long deployment. Distributor listings commonly cite a six month iBeLink factory warranty, though terms vary by channel and batch, so confirm coverage on your units at order; iBeLink is a smaller manufacturer than Bitmain, so spare parts and third party repair options are less widely available and that belongs in a multi unit decision. On hosting, MillionMiner operates managed US facilities with the single phase industrial power and ventilation this hardware needs, which is worth pricing alongside the machine because at 3,400W the electricity rate is the largest ongoing variable you can influence. On availability, Blake2B hardware moves in and out of stock quickly when Siacoin interest rises and iBeLink production runs are smaller than Bitmain's, so contact sales through the Get a Quote button for current availability, batch timing and pricing rather than relying on a published date.